(The Epoch Times)—I have lost multiple restaurants over the past few years. The final two closed last year in California.
At first, it was easy to explain. COVID-19 hit, and everything changed overnight. Then came the actor strikes, the writer strikes, and the fires that swept through Los Angeles. One by one, these events reshaped the economic and cultural landscape. The city felt different. People moved differently. They spent differently.
Restaurants, especially the kind I built, started to struggle in a way that felt deeper than a temporary downturn. I operated in what I would call the middle, casual, sit-down, mid-priced restaurants. Not fast food, not fine dining. The place where families gather, where people linger, where community happens over a meal.
That middle is disappearing.
I watched a shift in behavior, in real time. The customer who used to go to a casual sit-down restaurant is now ordering at the counter in a fast casual setting, while the person who used to go to fast casual is pulling back even further, choosing fast food because it fits their budget. Those who regularly eat at fine dining establishments can continue to do so. There was no fall down into the middle from the top. Instead, everyone stepped down a rung, leaving the middle hollowed out.
At the time, I thought this might be a California story, but it wasn’t. It was an early warning.
Now, in 2026, we are seeing major chains, fast food and fast casual alike, announce closures, bankruptcies, and restructurings. Names that once seemed untouchable are shrinking their footprints:
- Wendy’s ~300 locations closing
- Pizza Hut ~250 locations closing
- Papa John’s ~200 locations closing (restructuring)
- Jack in the Box ~50 to 100 locations closing
- Red Robin up to ~70 locations closing
- Outback Steakhouse ~40 locations closing
- Denny’s ~150 locations closed or closing
- Red Lobster dozens of locations (bankruptcy)
- Noodles & Company ~30 to 35 locations closing
- Popeyes franchise group dozens of locations (bankruptcy)
- Bahama Breeze all remaining locations closing
- TGI Fridays dozens of locations (bankruptcy or restructuring)
This is not a recovery. It is a continuation.
And it’s not one dramatic collapse. There is no single moment you can point to and say, “That’s when it all fell apart.” Instead, it’s thousands of quiet closures, a lease not renewed, a location that simply doesn’t reopen, a family deciding they can’t keep going.
Those closures feel subtle. They happen without headlines, without press releases, without national attention. But the list above tells a different story. When hundreds of locations are closing across major national chains, when bankruptcies and restructurings are happening at scale, that is not quiet, not subtle, and not just background economic noise. That is something breaking in plain sight.
When you place those two realities next to each other, the quiet disappearance of family restaurants and the very public contraction of major chains, it becomes harder to dismiss this as a normal cycle. It begins to look less like churn and more like a system under strain.
The data is harder to track for small, independent restaurants, but the picture is clear. In 2025, the United States saw a net loss of roughly 9,500 restaurants. When you account for new openings, that suggests closer to 15,000 closures in a single year, the vast majority of them independent, family-run establishments.
If you ask why, you will hear the same answers, leases are not being renewed, margins are too tight, owners are burned out. All of that is true. It was true for me.
I closed my flagship restaurant, one I never wanted to close, while it was still technically profitable, but we were barely making it and the trajectory was not improving. When I went to renew my lease, the landlord demanded a significant rent increase and an additional personal guarantee. This was after 10 years of never missing a payment, 10 years of being an anchor tenant in that plaza.
I believe he thought I was bluffing, that I would blink first. But once I made the decision to close and began dismantling the restaurant, the offers started coming, concessions, flexibility, terms that would have kept us open. By then, it was too late.
Anyone who has owned a restaurant understands burnout. It is a business that never closes, long hours, thin margins, constant pressure, and almost no room for error. When something goes wrong, your customers feel it immediately, and you spend more time apologizing than celebrating.
You get into it because you want to cook, to nourish people, to serve your community. Instead, you end up buried in compliance, legal issues, taxes, and regulation. For years, my assistant in Los Angeles would tell people she worked in compliance. When they asked what that meant, she would explain that she was a personal assistant to someone running multiple businesses in California. In that environment, compliance is a full-time job.
The regulatory burden is real, and in my case, it became too heavy to carry. But this is no longer just a California problem.
When even the cheapest, most standardized, most heavily optimized food models in the country can’t make the numbers work, we are looking at something much bigger. When major pizza chains and fast food giants can’t figure out the formula, it is not a brand problem. It is a system problem.
From the farm all the way to the plate, the cost structure is breaking down. Regulation, labor, input costs, and debt are stacking in a way that makes it increasingly difficult to operate a viable food business.
So what do we make of it?
I wish I could say this was happening because people are eating better, that consumers are rejecting processed food and moving toward healthier, more intentional choices. That is not what I see.
Where I live now, in central Texas, fast food drive thrus are still full. Processed food is still dominant. The demand is there, and yet both ends of the food system are under pressure.
On one end, farms are closing at alarming rates. On the other, restaurants are disappearing just as quickly. In between, we are told that food has never been more abundant or more affordable.
These two realities can both be true. Cheap, abundant food that farmers are losing money to produce on one end, and food that is contributing to metabolic dysfunction on the other, is not a win for anyone. There is an expression about burning the candle at both ends. It is clear now that the food system is doing exactly that, burning down at both ends while only the middlemen seem to be surviving.
Behind every restaurant that closes is not just a failed business. It is a family that lost its livelihood, employees who lost their jobs, and a community that lost a gathering place. Multiply that by thousands, and the ripple effects become impossible to ignore.
Economists tend to focus on the stock market, GDP, and macro indicators that suggest stability or growth. But what does it mean when tens of thousands of food businesses—farms and restaurants alike—are disappearing? What does it mean when the people who actually grow food and prepare it can’t make a living doing so?
This is not a single shock. It is a slow squeeze, and the question is not just what caused it, but where it leads.
If we continue down this path, where the middle disappears, where small operators cannot survive, and even large chains struggle to stay profitable, we are left with a food system that is more consolidated, more fragile, and more disconnected from the communities it is supposed to serve.
I have lived this from the inside. I have closed the doors, paid the final bills, and walked away from something I built over years. What I see now is not a temporary contraction. It is a restructuring.
Unless we start asking harder questions about the underlying economics of our food system, we may wake up one day to find that the places we gathered, the businesses that fed us, and the people who made it all possible are simply gone.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.
